If you are on one of Richard’s e-mail lists, you probably already know: Local prog-politico Richard Salzman has officially entered the blogosphere.
His first post is pretty interesting, a between-the-lines analysis of the new contract AT&T sent out to all its customers. (I tossed mine in the recycling pile when I saw it was not a bill.)
I’d have to say Richard could have come up with a more creative name for his blog. “Richard Salzman“ is short and to the point, but it doesn’t have much zing to it.
Aug. 24, 2008 at 12:19 pm
“Officially” being the operative word.
Aug. 24, 2008 at 7:09 pm
I hope Rose is willing to go toe to toe with him directly on a daily basis
Aug. 24, 2008 at 7:13 pm
Is says “an occasional blog”, so probably not daily.
As to the name, were you thinking of something like:
Jennifer Savage?
Aug. 24, 2008 at 7:15 pm
Maybe the NCJ can do a more in-depth story on this, with some legal analysis?
Aug. 24, 2008 at 8:13 pm
I don’t think there’s anything illegal about Richard starting a blog. It’s a free country.
Aug. 24, 2008 at 8:37 pm
That’s really up for debate at this point.
Aug. 25, 2008 at 7:43 am
No, not the blog. A legal analysis of AT&T’s new contract.
Aug. 25, 2008 at 8:18 am
“Richard Salzman” works. “Disreputable Manipulator” is probably too long.
Aug. 25, 2008 at 12:01 pm
Irony is lost on anonymous posters criticizing Richard Salzman for using his own name.
Aug. 25, 2008 at 12:02 pm
Who care if AT&T is letting 3rd parties listen to your communications? Better to attack the messenger who points this out!